Can Pakistan afford to lose more people than Britain?

Chien(ne)s Sans Frontieres has a good post today about yesterday’s train crash in Pakistan, wondering why that accident, which killed almost six times as many people as last week’s terrorist attacks in London, hasn’t been covered as much as those attacks. “I guess the country (Pakistan, that is) is not as glamorous as the UK and Pakistan could afford to lose 300+. But London’s 37 are more important,” she says. This is similar to a question I asked the other day. Why is London getting so much more coverage than these other disasters? Is it true that people think Western European lives are more important than African or Asian lives?

Technorati Tags: |


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s